Sunday, February 25, 2007

decoration


living room
Originally uploaded by annethelibrarian.
So K got awesomely inspired this week and painted the living room walls. They are a parchment color with one "basketweave" (tan) accent wall, and it looks so good! No more baby blue faux finishedness, yay.

Today we hung knickyknacky shelves and some photos/art. I'm sooo friggin' happy with how it looks. We still need to paint the trim, and eventually the carpet will come out and the hardwoods will be refinished, but the floors will be a long way off (when we can't remember in such great detail the pain of moving all the furniture into the house in the first place).

I'm happy to say that the living room finally feels like ours. (And yay! Karl for getting us going on it!)

Labels: , , , ,

2 comments links to this post

Net Neutrality

Save the Internet!




via Boing Boing

Labels: , ,

0 comments links to this post

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Run, Fat Boy, Run!

I'm admittedly a huge fan of Simon Pegg, and this trailer doesn't do anything to diminish that. (Yes, even those ridiculous bike shorts aren't enough.)

Labels: , ,

0 comments links to this post

Scrotum is not a dirty word

Bookshelves of Doom does it again!

Labels: , , ,

5 comments links to this post

Twinkle's Big City Knits: 31 Chunky-Chic Designs by Wenlan Chia

This gorgeous book of knitting patterns for chunky yarns is a well-designed treat. The pages are thick and the photographs lush. Being a sucker for stupid glossy fashion magazines (I know, I know, they're often misogynist, promote consumer culture and bad body image, and have about a thousand other things wrong with them, despite all that I still like to look at them), I can see that this book has many similar design elements/photographic choices, but it's so much better!

For one, there are the knitting patterns, which are not at all intimidating (love, love, LOVE the amount of white space on the instruction pages), look fabulously not-homemade (making things yourself is awesome, but things that look homemade are often less fun to wear than they were to make - HANDmade is an entirely different term with altogether different implications), and probably knit up in record time given the thickness of the yarns used.

For two, there are photos of the most adorable french bulldog you've ever seen (not counting our half-frenchie half-boston terrier, Logan) throughout the book and not once is it made to wear a silly piece of clothing you know just drives it nuts.

Despite the fact that the models pictured are typically skeletal, many of the actual patterns are for items that just about anyone can wear. Who doesn't need another cardigan, and is it possible for a scarf to look bad on any particular body type?

I was about to be annoyed by the fact that all the patterns are designed to be knit with yarns by Twinkle Handknit Yarns (the author founded the company) , which from the list of stores in the back of the book, may not be available in my immediate geographic area. However, the author has included a helpful note suggesting other yarns that work well as substitutes for her own. Hooray for that!

I'm very excited to try one of these patterns (the Karate Sweater looks delish and though I've not yet knit a cardigan, I think I could do it). If it goes well, this book will definitely make my list of must-own knitting books.

Labels: , , , ,

7 comments links to this post

This American Life coming to a TV near you


This American Life
Originally uploaded by annethelibrarian.
That's right, the rumors are true: brilliant and original radio show This American Life is hopping media. I'd heard about this awhile back but now there's proof, and it looks damn good. The cintematography looks very good and like nothing else on TV. Sign me up.



via TV Squad

Labels: , ,

4 comments links to this post

The Invention of Hugo Cabret

Apparently Martin Scorcese loves Hugo Cabret as much as the rest of us and wants to make it into a movie. (Why doesn't Brian Selznick get his photo in the Variety article? Weak.) I'm inclined to be skeptical, but who knows?

via Cinematical

Labels: , , , , ,

0 comments links to this post

Monday, February 19, 2007

Voting begins for 2007 Thumbs Up! Award

The Teen Services Division of the Michigan Library Association is pleased to announce that voting has begun for the 2007 Thumbs Up! Award.

Since 1986, the Thumbs Up! Award has honored the best teen title published during the previous year. Since 2001, the Thumbs Up! Award has included a teen vote. We ask that you promote the Thumbs Up! Award to teens ages 12 to 18 in your classroom, your media center, your library, and your community and ask them to vote for their favorite title by May 25, 2007. The title with the most teen votes will automatically be an honor title if it is not selected as the winner by the Thumbs Up! Award Committee. The winning title and honor titles will be announced in June 2007.

The Thumbs Up! Award committee considered more than 300 teen titles first published in the U.S. between January 1 and December 31, 2006. Our hardworking committee (listed below) has narrowed that list to the Top Twenty titles, and we ask that teens help us in selecting the best teen book of the year.

The Top Twenty ballot (PDF) is available on the Michigan Library Association website. This document includes annotations. You are encouraged to make paper copies of the ballot available to your teens.

This page provides cover shots of the Top Twenty titles as well, but doesn't print as nicely.

Lastly, the Top Twenty are listed here.

You may email the total number of votes for each title to Anne Heidemann, Thumbs Up! Award committee chair, at aeheidemann at gmail dot com, or you may mail your ballots to me at the address at the end of this email. Either way, submit your votes by May 25, 2007!

The Top Twenty list, in alphabetical order by author:

* The Astonishing Life of Octavian Nothing, Traitor to the Nation, Volume One: The Pox Party by MT Anderson
* Scrambled Eggs at Midnight by Brad Barkley & Heather Hepler
* Pieces of Georgia by Jen Bryant
* Nick & Norah's Infinite Playlist by Rachel Cohn & David Levithan
* Just Listen by Sarah Dessen
* Golden by Cameron Dokey
* Copper Sun by Sharon Draper
* What Happened to Cass McBride by Gail Giles
* Saint Iggy by K.L. Going
* An Abundance of Katherines by John Green
* Rash by Pete Hautman
* Sold by Patricia McCormick
* Dairy Queen by Catherine Gilbert Murdock
* Between Mom and Jo by Julie Ann Peters
* King Dork by Frank Portman
* Notes from the Midnight Driver by Jordan Sonnenblick
* It's Kind of a Funny Story by Ned Vizzini
* Skin by Adrienne Maria Vrettos
* The Storm Thief by Chris Wooding
* The Book Thief by Markus Zusak


Please encourage your teens to vote early and vote often! While the award is given through the Michigan Library Association, teens anywhere may vote. If you have any questions, please contact committee chair Anne Heidemann.

Gold seals for winning titles and silver seals for honor titles are available for purchase from the Michigan Library Association. Please contact Anne Winkel, winkela at mlcnet dot org , for pricing and quantity information.

The Teen Services Division extends our thanks to the 2007 Thumbs Up! Award Committee for all of their hard work:

* Allison Boyer, Loutit District Library
* Jayne Cogsdill Damron, Farmington Community Library
* Dawn Dittmar, Highland Township Public Library
* Kathleen Gallagher, Grosse Point Public Library
* Jennifer Grodnoski, Monroe County Library System
* Stefanie Halliday, Belleville High School
* Pat Hemingray, Auburn Hills Public Library
* Tracy Morsi, Clinton-Macomb Public Library
* Linda Pavonetti, Oakland University
* Karen Persello, Chelsea District Library
* Erynne Purvis, Capital Area District Library
* Beth Revers, DeWitt Public Library
* Katie Rosen, Rochester Hills Public Library
* Karrie Waarala, Auburn Hills Public Library

If you will be attending the Spring Institute conference in Frankenmuth, Michigan March 28-30, please stop by our Top Twenty book discussion the afternoon of Thursday, March 29. This is your opportunity as library workers to tell the committee what you think of each title--what should have been on the list, what never should have made it, and which title you think should win. Registration and information for this fabulous three-day conference are available on the MLA website.

Thank you!

Labels: , , , , , ,

4 comments links to this post

Cult of Castellucci

Oh my goodness! I must have this Cult of Castellucci t-shirt! The Castellucci in question is Cecil, author of kickass teen novels Boy Proof and Beige (among others! Those two are my current faves).

I also need the Trust Snape design, so it looks like I'll be putting in an order as soon as they're both available.

This and other awesome designs are available on a rotating basis at BoD's Etsy shop

Labels: ,

3 comments links to this post

MTV discovers what we've known all along...

Namely, that books for children are awesome! On the heels of adaptations such as Bridge to Terabithia and Charlotte's Web, MTV Movie News speculates on ten titles they think would make good movies. I'm not convinced that every, or even any great children's books should necessarily be made into movies, but they've pegged a few that I'd totally dig. Unless they ruined them, which is a very real risk and one that happens more often than not. This is why I'm so skeptical despite my love of movies. Of the titles they listed, two are childhood favorites of mine: The Westing Game by Ellen Raskin and Lafcadio: The Lion Who Shot Back by Shel Silverstein. The former would easily translate to live action and, as long as they didn't Hollywoodify the characters, would totally work. The latter, though, would be dependant on animation of some sort and I just can't imagine it being any good.

Random Lafcadio-related fact about me: One of the things I liked most about Lafcadio was his love of marshmallows, and the fact that he had a marshmallow suit created for him. I learned how to sew as a youngster and the concept of threading marshmallows into a suit just blew my little mind. Loved it. I also loved eating actual marshmallows until the day when I ate a signifcant portion of a large bag of them and haven't desired to eat any since.

via Big A, little a

Labels: , , ,

0 comments links to this post

better than D-list

C-List Blogger

See what sort of authority you've got at Kineda

via Libraryola

Labels: , ,

0 comments links to this post

Sunday, February 18, 2007

super sweaters

Giles has quite a few huge knit items in this Fall 2007 Ready-to-Wear collection. By huge, I mean humongous. The item pictured here is one of the more reserved designs. Definitely click through to see some of the others.

via Fashiontribes

Labels: ,

0 comments links to this post

Saturday, February 17, 2007

wanna be Bret Michaels' next lovah?


Bret Michaels
Originally uploaded by annethelibrarian.
Hot on the heels of Flavor Flav's successful Flavor of Love show on Vh1, Poison frontman Bret Michaels has signed on for a July-premiere of his own reality love-search show. I'm sure it'll be ridiculous, but I'll definitely check it out.

via The Futon Critic

Labels: ,

2 comments links to this post

Thursday, February 15, 2007

R U A n00b? workshop

Today I attended a workshop presented by the Michigan Library Consortium entitled R U A n00b?: Bridging the Gap Between Boomers and Gamers. The workshop was held at the west campus of Lansing Community College, a truly workshop-friendly venue with individual plugs at each seat and complimentary wireless throughout the building. I blogged about the final session of the day for the MLC The Library Rebooted program series blog, but it was such a great workshop that I wanted to blog about it here, too.

The day began with a remote presentation by Lori Bell on Second Life (she's Lorelei Junot there). Despite a few technical glitches (what's a workshop without at least a couple of those?) she was able to show us what Second Life looks like and some of the library-related buildings and areas. She also detailed some of the potential uses of Second Life for libraries and librarians. I had trouble logging in on my lappy, and then once I finally got in, the world didn't want to res very quickly, so that was irritating. It was neat, though, to see a few of us in the room all gathered around the MLC hot tub.

Angela Semifero then spoke about MySpace, including how it works, how to set up an account, what a profile looks like, how libraries might use it (including as a way to connect with teens, a reference tool, and more), some of the potential issues MySpace can present, and in general, how useful a tool it can be. She showed some examples of library MySpace pages and talked about patrons using MySpace in the library. Angela is always awesome.

Ann Arbor District Library's gaming guru Eli Neiburger presented Gaming for Noobzorz: A Crash Course in Gaming for the Uninitiated (PDF). Eli is well-known in this state (and many others) for his expertise and passion for gaming. His Powerpoint was one of the best I've seen—truly illustrative and including a lot of fun graphics that engage the audience. I overheard more than a few people at lunch saying that they really appreciated his ability to take an audience from zero to comfortable with a new topic in just a few minutes. He's also super-fun to listen to even for those of us who are already familiar with his material. He spoke a bit about the brand new Nintendo Wii and showed some adorable photos of his son, who shares his passion for all things Nintendo.

We then broke for lunch, which was, happily, both vegetarian-friendly and delicious. The buffet included Caesar salad, garlic toast, steamed green beans, cheese ravioli, and chocolate chip cannoli. (There was also a meat lasagna, I think). The dining area was an open area with comfortably spaced round tables and real table service (much nicer than the dining commons-grade flatware usually found at conference sites). We had a leisurely hour for eating and networking, and the food line moved really quickly. This is one of the best workshop dining experiences I've had. Kudos to LCC!

After lunch, Superpatron Edward Vielmetti talked about “Everything Else.” Vielmetti spoke about how libraries are still essentially about books for many patrons and that sometimes library technology can get in the way of actually finding them. He showcased some of the neato things that the Ann Arbor District Library has been doing with their SOPAC, including tagging, dynamic item recommendations, and the cute old-fashioned catalog cards we all remember so fondly. He also introduced a myriad of social media tools, including Library Thing, Twitter, tagging, del.icio.us, Flickr, and more. He easily illustrated his point that there are a multitude of opportunities for people to participate in communities using social media tools. Vielmetti sees that the library website (including blog, OPAC, etc) can become a social network for patrons, and that this kind of community involvement can only be good for the library in the long run.

The final session of the day was a Facebook Panel Discussion, moderated by the lovely and hip Monica Harris. Five college students participated:

Matt, 23, Michigan State University student, Facebook user for 2 years, first video game: Zack McCracken
Kate, MSU student, Facebook user since it started, first video game: Oregon Trail
Precious, 19, MSU student, Facebook user for 1 ½ years, first video game: Duck Hunt
Lauren, 19, MSU student, Facebook user for 1 ½ years, doesn't play video games
Katie, 19, Lansing Community College student, Facebook user: 6 months, first video game: Oregon Trail

Disclaimer: I did my best to transcribe what the panelists said, but I'm sure to have missed some things and possibly mistyped others. These are not exact quotes. (If you're a panelist reading this and I made an error, please let me know.)

Q: How would you describe/define Facebook?
Lauren: Facebook is more local than MySpace. It was originally through your college (you had to have college email address to participate). Facebook allows you to search by school and hometown so it's easier to find people. All the info you put in turns into a link, so it's easy to click and see everyone else with the same info.
Precious: Facebook is a way to connect with people from high school. It's a younger version of Reunion.com. I got on to Facebook to stay connected to people I wasn't directly in contact with anymore. People update their photos often and events are posted in advance.
Katie: It's a great way to get connected with people before you leave for college (during the summer after high school). It's a great ice breaker. You can say, “I saw you on Facebook.”

Q: Do you use Facebook for other purposes? Dating?
Katie: Not so much for dating. It's more of a friend thing.
Kate: I coordinate a residency program and I regularly looks at Facebook with an eye toward who to hire. Many people don't seem to think about employers looking at their accounts.
Precious: I knows that my boss does look at Facebook before selecting interns. Because it was available only to college students in the past, many might not realize that it is now very public. I know some people that have not been selected for internships because of their Facebook profiles. There was quite a bit of resistance (among those with profiles) when it first became public, some started petitions and such. I use it for clubs at MSU, because all events and info are listed there. People check Facebook more than they would be likely to see a poster on a bulletin board.
Lauren: In the past 6 months I've used it for finding information on having a particular surgery. I found others who described their experiences having the same surgery. I created a group when I was running for an elected position so I could easily make connections with potential supporters.

Q: How has Facebook changed? Who was allowed to use it before and presently?
Matt: It started with a small group of universities and then branched out to students at other universities. Then it opened to high school students, and now it is open to anyone (like MySpace). Before it opened up, there weren't as many privacy settings on Facebook as there are on MySpace, but more have now been added. In order to see full profiles of students from any university, you have to be friends with someone from that school. You can use it to get out political messages, which is useful (for example, there are groups focused on issues such as those presented in the movie An Inconvenient Truth) in providing a direct link to a person or group of people, which is handier than a poster.

Q: How many friends do you have on Facebook and how many of them do you know in real life?
Kate: 97 friends; I know them all in real life.
Precious: 405 friends at MSU and 900 friends altogether. I know them all in real life.
Lauren: 350-450 friends at MSU and 500-600 total. There are a large number I don't actually know. You add someone to your friends because they seem like they might be cool to hang out with, but it never happens and you keep them as your friend. Many are also acquaintances who you don't know well.
Katie: 300 friends; I've met everyone at least once, perhaps in passing. I probably know most of them fairly well.
Matt: I guess the choice is to lie or to look like a loser. 75 friends at MSU and 100 friends total.

Q: We've all seen the news features showing a kid who claims to be addicted. Do you find Facebook addicting?
Matt: No. It's in my Internet rotation. I check it maybe 10 minutes, 3 times a day.
Lauren: I don't need an intervention or anything, but if I'm not busy, I could spend 10 hours a week easily. If I'm pulling an all-nighter, I'll stray from Word to Facebook and it's suddenly 3AM and I'm looking at groups and what my friends are doing. At times it can be addicting.
Precious: I think it's addicting. I tried to quit. I know people who tried to quit and then came back. If I quit, it'll take too much time to re-find everyone. There are people who I went to Kindergarten with and they found me on Facebook and I remembered them, and we're friends all over again. Now I know a lot about them. To reconnect strongly with people I hadn't seen in years, that's when it became addicting. You think of someone and wonder if they're on Facebook. There are so many interesting groups, like I saw one that was: “Join this group if you or someone you know has been run over by a CATA bus.” It becomes multifaceted and interesting. It's nonacademic, but you get the pleasure of looking at pictures and reading profiles, which is so much more interesting than studying. That's when it becomes addicting. Just like AIM. There are groups like “Facebook and AIM are making me fail out of college.”
Lauren: Every time the page is refreshed it shows six of your friends and it rotates, so you'll see someone you forgot about and you have to see what they're up to. It's definitely addicting.

Q: Do you care about how many friends you have? Do you judge people by how many friends they have? Do you judge people based on the comments on their profiles?
Lauren: I wouldn't want to have just, like, four friends. I would wonder why the person wouldn't know more people out of the thousands of people who are out there. If anyone asks to be my friend, I always say yes. I might limit what they can see of my profile, but I always add them. I do look at and wonder what someone might have on their comment wall. Sometimes a really quiet studious girl will have a graphic description of what happened at a party and it makes you wonder.
Kate: I don't care that much about how many friends I have. Sadly enough, the best thing is that I can look at people from HS who I don't want to talk to again but I can find out what they're doing with their lives. We don't want to talk to these people, but we want to know what's going on in their lives.

Q: Is there comment etiquette? Do you need to comment back when someone comments on your wall?
Kate: It's rude not to comment back when someone comments to you. I realized I didn't comment back to my old roommate and she's probably mad at me now.
Precious: Most of the kids from my graduating class are on there. 90% of them I wouldn't want to see in real life, but I check their Facebook to see what they're doing. Some people you're happy to reconnect, some you reconnect with to see if they've got gossip. There's just something about knowing what people are doing and so much about them. You can read anything about any kid and know everything about their lives in two hours.

Q: Do you include your address, phone number, or other personal information on your profile? Do you use your real photo?
Lauren: I don't have my real photo as my main photo but only because I found a cool bumper sticker to use right now instead. I have my real dorm address, but if you go to MSU you can find that easily anyway, so it's not a big deal. Before I came to college, I was able to find my roommate by putting in my address and clicking on it to see who else had the same one.
Katie: You can have your dorm info, but I don't put my phone number out there. As far as pictures, you can get tagged in a million pictures every weekend.

Q: How many of you have more than 100 pictures on Facebook? 3
Q: More than 200? 2

Q: Can you tell us more about what tagging a photo is?
Katie: Tagging a photo is when someone posts a photo and they put a little box around your image and label it with your name. From your profile, there is a link to all photos you've been tagged in. This can be bad with job interviews, etc. The majority of people in this room went to college and they know what goes on there, so there are a lot of pictures out there of all the illegal things that are going on.
Lauren: You can untag yourself in any photo, so it's not hard to undo it, but it would take a long time if you're tagged in a lot of photos. There is nudity out there and some people may not know about it. It's not allowed but people upload photos containing nudity anyway.

Q: Why do people feel comfortable putting these things out there?
Lauren: Because it started out as open to college students only, people knew employers couldn't look at it. I would recommend people use the privacy settings that are available to them.
Matt: I feel like there's a certain view that it's “just Facebook.” People don't take it as seriously or think about employers. You can use it in that way (looking for potential employees), but it's not the original intent. I don't feel it's designed for that kind of thing so I don't feel uncomfortable with it. It's just me and my friends sharing stuff.
Precious: When I first got on, it was just a fun time, a way to connect. The best way to do it was pictures. At first it was just photos of parties for members of clubs, fraternities, and stuff, just for you and your friends to look at. Now that it's open the orientation of Facebook has changed. When it started, it was as a Harvard student's programming project. He never intended it to get where it is today. It was just something private for him and his buddies and it got bigger and bigger.

Fact: Facebook has more photos than many photo-dedicated sites including Flickr.

Q: Do you feel like older adults sometimes misunderstand sites like Facebook and MySpace? How would you explain their fears about privacy? I see a lot of news reports about these sites and in the library community focusing on privacy of personal information and fears about predators. Do you feel that's overblown or valid?
Lauren: My mom was all, “be careful – employers are going to look at that.” I don't put any info out there that I don't want just anyone to know. I would never put my address on MySpace, but I feel safer on Facebook because when it started, it was just people who could find me anyway. For adults, their social networks are all in-person, but in college you don't have time to do that so this gives you a way that you can still connect with people. My friends who live far away can stay in touch using Facebook. It's virtual but still very real. You don't have to set up a lunch, you just send a message on Facebook.
Kate: In some situations concerns are valid, particularly with MySpace. My 13 year-old cousin has a MySpace, and when I looked at it I thought, if a 50 year-old man looked at this, he'd enjoy it. So I see the concern that we're putting so much of ourselves out there that we're leaving ourselves open to be taken advantage of. The other side is that if parents are using Facebook or MySpace and being involved with it with their children, it's easier for them to say “make sure you use this privacy setting” and such. They can encourage use of it while still having safety features.
Katie: I agree with Kate as far as MySpace goes. It's much broader and not so networked. In Facebook, you join a particular network (based on school, geography, etc) and people outside that network can't see your profile. That makes it a lot less scary. MySpace is a lot less personal, less safe. Any weirdo in the whole wide world can look at your profile.
Matt: I think that's a really good point. The structure of Facebook is much different than MySpace. There are bubbles of groups (networks) but MySpace is not like that. If I click on some random person on MySpace, they're always in my extended network but I have no clue how. Everyone on there is connected somehow. There's not a noted structure; no networks of people. Facebook seems safer as far as personal information goes.

Q: Most of you have said that you like Facebook better, but four of you do have a MySpace profile. Why?
Matt: Why not?
Kate: Originally I made a MySpace profile because I had friends who didn't go to college or were older and not in college so they couldn't get a Facebook. So I use it to check up on people who aren't on Facebook.

Audience Q: It seems like MySpace is becoming five-minutes ago (it's too big, everyone's there, it's too commercial) and Facebook has a cooler appeal, but now that it's open to anyone, it seems it might be not as cool. What's the next hot thing that has more exclusivity?
Matt: I wouldn't say that MySpace is five-minutes ago, it's just not as well-designed as Facebook. MySpace is slow, has design that isn't clean, and it takes forever to log in. Facebook is easier to use and better designed.
Precious: Unless someone is brighter than that Harvard grad (who created Facebook), there won't be anything better than Facebook. Now you can even give gifts (this service just started a few days ago)! I used it even though I don't really understand it. Every college has its own social networking system and that is totally private. It takes the place of the old Facebook. I know MSU and Ferris have them already. You use Facebook for what it does and the private college one for more private stuff. There were benefits to Facebook opening up, not as many as there were problems, but it does have good things. I don't think people would hop on another bandwagon.
Lauren:We don't want exclusivity back on Facebook. It just created more bubbles so you can connect with those who aren't college students. You don't have to be open to them but you can be. I don't see a problem with it being open.
Katie: MySpace is slow and ugly and difficult to use sometimes but it is a bit more personalized than Facebook and that's what I like about it. You can put pictures on your profile background or other silly things that make it more personal to you. The only thing on Facebook that isn't cool is that everyone's page is the same and the only personalized part is the info they provide.

Audience Q: What do you think of Second Life?
Kate: I have no hand-eye coordination so it was really frustrating the first time I tried it and I haven't used it again. I had no idea what I was doing. I kind of followed the tutorials but I couldn't walk. For me personally I don't like it because I don't have the dexterity to make it work.
Audience suggestion: They need to combine the Wii-mote technology so that it's easier to walk.
(The rest of the panel has not used Second Life yet.)

Audience Q: If your college library had a presence on Facebook, what would you want to see there?
(silence)
Kate: MSU's library website is amazing. It would be cool if there was a catalog search right from Facebook. It would also be cool if they could tell you in Facebook when your books are due or renew them right on Facebook. It's not a big deal because you can open the library site in a new tab, but it would be handy to have it right in Facebook.

Audience Q: How do the bubbles (networks) work?
Matt: Unless you're friends with someone or in the same network, you wouldn't be able to see their profile. Your college email address (domain) sets your network automatically. Anyone outside that network, you'd have to search for them and add them manually. If you're both in the same geographic network, you can view each other's profiles.

Audience Q: Will you keep up with it after you graduate? Do faculty members have Facebooks?
Precious: TAs and some faculty do.
Lauren: Some profs say you have to wait until you're out of their class.
Precious: The prof in my friend's music class wouldn't let students add him. He said, “as soon as you're not my student, I'll friend you.”

Audience Q: Do you think that the security is better on Facebook than MySpace?
Matt: The security is a bit better on Facebook because of the type of programing that is used. MySpace has had holes (security issues). At some point, even if your profile was private, you could make a certain change to the URL and it became visible. That has since been fixed, but there are some other issues like that with MySpace.
Kate: You have to be a Facebook member to look at profiles.
Precious: You can Google anyone and come up with their MySpace. I'm glad you can't do it with Facebook.
Katie: On Facebook, people can't see your profile unless you're friends with them. With Facebook, it says whether you're in college or not. We're all over 18 and on MySpace it's harder to pick out the creepers.

At this point, time was running out and the audience raised no further questions for the panelists. I found it very interesting to hear the panelists' impressions of the differences between Facebook and MySpace. I think some of them may have been unaware of the security features MySpace now offers (my guess is that because they use it less, or not at all, they just haven't seen that those options exist). This issue of what is often thought of as private information being made public is quite intriguing, and I found the panelists' perspectives very insightful.

All of this technological innovation in libraries is so exciting! I feel like there's so much we as library workers can do to engage our communities, and both connect with them and help them connect with others. Not very many libraries are as innovative in terms of social networking as Ann Arbor, but not many libraries have dedicated the resources that they have. Libraries should make the commitment to employ IT staff who are skilled and have ideas, and they must also listen to the ideas the staff (all staff, not just IT) and patrons present. Even those libraries who may not be able to make staffing changes right away should embrace the technology that is readily available (and often free, as in the case of MySpace and Facebook) to make these all-important connections with their patrons. All in all, if you feel like a n00b, you should know that there are resources available to help you: workshops like this one, expertise offered by colleagues and peers, and the knowledge and interest of your patrons. Use that social network until you feel l33t.

Labels: , , , ,

6 comments links to this post

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

Official Cybils Press Release: 2006 Cybils Literary Awards Announced


CYBILS Medal
Originally uploaded by annethelibrarian.
Cybils Literary Awards Announced

Bloggers sought a balance between literary quality and "kid appeal"among the 482 titles nominated by the public.

Contact: Anne Boles Levy
(909) 908-3656
anne@bookbuds.net

CHICAGO, Illinois—A terrified squirrel, a quiet egg and an infinite playlist were among those earning top honors today in the first-ever awards from kidlit bloggers.

The Children's and Young Adult Bloggers' Literary Awards, or Cybils, were won by nine books in eight categories, from picture books to graphic novels and even fantasy and science fiction.

The awards cap five months of activity by roughly 80 volunteers, who plowed through 482 books nominated by the public at the Cybils blog. The contest grew out of a comment on a blog post last October and rapidly gained traction in the tight-knit community of librarians, teachers, homeschoolers, parents, authors and illustrators, dubbed the "kidlitosphere."

The idea was to find books with literary merit that kids couldn't put down, striking a balance between the highbrow Newberys, for example, and the populist Quill awards.

Any children's or young adult title published in English in 2006 was eligible, and anyone could nominate a book. Nominees then went through two rounds of judging: those surviving the first cut were announced New Year's Day.

Here are the winning books:

Fiction - Picture Books:
Scaredy Squirrel by Melanie Watt
Kid's Can Press

Fiction - Middle Grade:
A Drowned Maiden's Hair by Laura Amy Schlitz
Candlewick Press

Fiction - Young Adult:
Nick and Norah's Infinite Playlist by Rachel Cohn and David Levithan
Knopf Books for Young Readers

Non-Fiction - Picture Books:
An Egg is Quiet written by Dianna Aston; illustrated by Sylvia Long
Chronicle Books

Non-Fiction - Middle Grade and Young Adult:
Freedom Walkers by Russell Freedman
Holiday House

Poetry:
Butterfly Eyes and Other Secrets of the Meadow written by Joyce Sidman, illustrated by Beth Krommes
Houghton Mifflin

Fantasy and Science Fiction:
Ptolemy's Gate by Jonathan Stroud
Hyperion: Miramax

Graphic Novels - Ages 12 and Under:
Amelia Rules, vol. 3: Superheroes by Jim Gownley
Renaissance Press

Graphic Novels - Ages 13 and Up:
American Born Chinese by Gene Yang
First Second

For further details on each winning book, please see the Cybils blog.

Labels: , ,

2 comments links to this post

2006 CYBILS announced!


CYBILS Medal
Originally uploaded by annethelibrarian.
Get yourself on over to the Cybils and see the list of winners!

It was a pleasure to work on the fiction picture book nominating committee and I truly hope to be involved again in the future. A huge HUZZAH! to all who were involved in this inaugural Cybils.

Labels: ,

2 comments links to this post

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

roll with it

New technologies can be hard for some people to adapt to.



via Fuse #8

Labels: , ,

0 comments links to this post

Monday, February 12, 2007

Hubert the Pudge: A Vegetarian Tale by Henrick Drescher

There are not a great many picture books about vegetarianism. There are even fewer about pudges (to my knowledge, this is the first and only). One reason that there are so few about vegetarianism, I believe, is that it is truly difficult for passionate adults to set aside their desire to educate and enlighten and sometimes even to lecture or attempt to shame readers into agreeing with them. In many -ism books, telling a good story falls by the wayside, fun is completely forgotten, and the illustrations are an afterthought.

Hubert the Pudge's illustrations are in no way an afterthought and despite a touch of lecture-iness, the descriptions of the pudges' lives at Farmer Jake's Pudge Processing Farm are straightforward. Like many storybook kept animals, Hubert yearns for freedom and makes a run for it through a small hole in the fence. Having reached the forest, Hubert dines on the wealth of plant life at his hooftips and (after one scary-noise-filled night) befriends the other animals who live there. Pudges don't normally live past eight months, so as Hubert ages (and eats) he grows exponentially, finally reaching "superchunky-normous" proportions.

All is well until he remembers his former friends, still trapped at the factory farm, so he and his new friends head back to his former home to set all the pudges free. Farmer Jake is coerced into promising to reevaluate his business and stop eating pudge. He also starts working out, gains a dapper new appearance, and falls in love with his trainer, Heidi. The two lovebirds start a new business, Jake and Heidi's Tofu Hot Dogs Company, which (natch) provides work for all those pudges with years of life to spare.

Despite being a vegetarian myself and thus interested in books on the topic, I was very skeptical when I picked this up. It does have some didactic moments and I'm sure there are those who will take offence. Overall, though, I enjoyed Hubert's journey and found the illustrations oddly appealing.

Labels: ,

2 comments links to this post

Alphabet Explosion: Search and Count from Alien to Zebra by John Nickle

Perfect for filling an afternoon, this alphabet search and count book devotes a page to each letter. Within that page, the reader is encouraged to find a myriad number (each page specifies how many to look for) of items illustrating that letter. Though each page is filled with images, there is a fair amount of space between and the result is an uncrowded success. Guidelines for guessing are stated outright (don't count the suction cups on the octopus as individual Os) and a list of answers is provided in the back. Readers are also encouraged to let the author and illustrator know (via email) if they find additional items. This is a fun book for an individual or for a pair searching together.

Labels: ,

0 comments links to this post

Brave Bitsy and the Bear by Angela McAllister, illustrated by Tiphanie Beeke

Upon turning to the first page of this story, the reader is immediately struck by the rich, lush watercolor forest scene. The earth tones are so intense that one is drawn right in. This immediacy is appropriate to the story, where Little Bitsy the rabbit has just fallen, "THUMP!" out of her little girl's pocket. Little Bitsy's store-bought purple color is a striking contrast to the natural environment she finds herself in. Before long, an imposing but ultimately friendly Bear appears and offers to help LB find her way home.

Knitting-related content!: After returning home, LB worries that Bear might have fallen asleep on his way back to his cave, and uses a ball of yarn from the knitting basket to mark her path from home.

This story is at once familiar and fresh, and the illustrations bring the characters completely to life. The winter theme makes it a perfect book to curl up with for reading together.

Labels: ,

0 comments links to this post

Not a Box by Antoinette Portis

This charming book shows the reader what happens when a young rabbit is asked, "Why are you sitting in a box?" It is, of course, not a box, but anything the rabbit can imagine it to be: a racecar, a mountain, a robot, and many other wonderful things. With very few words and strong, thick line drawings in a limited palette (which grows along with the young rabbit's not-a-box ideas), the design and illustrations mirror the simple-on-the-outside-ness of a cardboard box. The cover and endpapers provide the satisfyingly tactile experience of running ones hands over cardboard.

Labels: ,

0 comments links to this post

Sunday, February 11, 2007

Ralph Lauren brown ensemble

This snappy little Ralph Lauren outfit really appeals to me. It's very wearable and features a knit sweater and hat (though the jaunty angle of the hat is a bit over the top for every day). I'd wear the skirt a bit shorter, but at my height knee-length is better and this tall model definitely wears it well at this length.

I also love that this look does not reflect the boxy 80s look that seems so prevalent this season.

Labels: ,

0 comments links to this post

Rodarte knit dress

Entirely knit dresses are tricky. Given that much area and the forces of gravity, knit fabric can stretch out and get wonky and saggy. K's mom has told a story of when she knit a dress and it got progressively longer as the night wore on, going from a mini-dress to something distinctly not mini.

This dress by Rodarte might well have shape issues upon repeated wearing, but at first look it's mighty cute. It would only look good on someone tall, and is definitely designed for someone with few curves, but I do like the overall design. And those shoes are fabulous!

Labels: ,

0 comments links to this post

Yigal Azrouël blue knit hat

I'm not thrilled by the rest of the ensemble but this hat by Yigal Azrouel is lovely. It's a bit on the big side compared to the rest of her head, but the model probably has a bunch of long hair all caught up inside it which would make it a bit poofier than it might otherwise be.

Labels: ,

0 comments links to this post

Zero Maria Cornejo grey cardigan sweater

As ever, I'm on the lookout for knitwear and I'm always interested to see what shows up on the runway. This cardigan by Zero Maria Cornejo would actually be fairly easy to make, though all that stockinette stitch might get tedious.

Labels: ,

0 comments links to this post

You Should Read This


reading a red book
Originally uploaded by annethelibrarian.
Chasing Ray recently came up with a brilliant idea and has officially begun collecting nominations for the first ever You Should Read This (YSRT) Awards. 2007's topic will be Coming of Age stories, specifically:

This year I am looking for books that fall into the "Coming of Age" cateogory. (Thought I'd go easy this first year.) All books must predominanlty involve the protagonist coming of age. Things that knock a book out of this category: heavy plot reliance on a romance, on solving a mystery, on surviving a war, on killing aliens, etc. Also, just because your parents die does not mean you grow up - just means your parents die. So don't think that is a no-brainer inclusion.


Her goal is not to find a winner, but to create a list of great books that anyone (readers, parents, librarians, teachers, etc) can take and use as works for them. Nominees will be accepted until February 27, and the list will be published on February 28 (talk about instant gratification!).

Going by the comments, many of my recent faves have already been nominated, but multiple nominations do count, so I'll definitely be sending in a list myself.

To nominate a book, email Chasing Ray at colleenatchasingraydotcom .

Labels: ,

0 comments links to this post

Blogging allowed after all (mostly, anyway)

Back at ALA Midwinter, rumors were flying about whether or not literary award committee members would be allowed to blog about books during their terms.

As many of us had hoped, blogging will still be allowed. The policy states that

"Members of award committees who run or participate in social networking web sites or software, including blogs, wikis, electronic discussion lists, and the like, should not engage in any discussions about their ALSC award committee work, or about the status of eligible books in relationship to these awards during their term of committee service."

So you can blog about books. Can you state that you're on an award committee, or would that constitute discussion about your award committee work?

Lately I've seen several references to the fact that some librarians/experts-in-the-field consider blogs as a whole to be inferior. These opinions have ranged from those who see bloggers as